When Logging is Better at Preventing Tree-Canopy Loss than Protected Areas

Forest concessions, managing forests for commercial forest products, can be more effective in preventing deforestation than “protected area” forest management systems  (i.e; National Parks). This is evident looking at the tropical forests of northern Guatemala. How is this possible? The following four points help explain.

1. Selective Harvesting

In many countries with large tropical forests, laws require that logging within forest concessions be done selectively. While some trees are harvested, the majority remain in the timber stand, maintaining a canopy of different species and ages (Figure 1). In such concessions where selection forestry systems are applied, logging does not result in deforestation (Figure 2).

 

natural_gap_formation_large
Figure 1. The left shows a tree stand of different species and ages before selective harvesting, while the right is post selective harvesting.

 

Peten, Guatemala - Satellite (1).png
Figure 2. The large block of green in the upper right corner of this map of northern Guatemala shows forest that is harvested annually for timber, mainly Swietenia macrophylla commonly known as “Mahogany”

2. Rights to Harvest Forest Products

Forest concessions grant rights to enterprises, both communal and individual, to harvest forest products. These rights internalize the costs and benefits of forest management, incentivizing stewardship of the forest resource as capital. Forest user rights are especially important in tropical countries where the majority of forests are publicly owned.

3. Forest-Based Income

Through enterprise, forest products generate significant income for rural populations. The community of Carmelita with its forest concession in northern Guatemala earns nearly US$ 200,000 annually selling logs, lumber, furniture, wild plants, and ecotourism packages (El Financiero 2014). In a country with a middle-class annual income of $1,600 (World Bank 2010), this is a large amount of income being generated from the forests for the people of the community.

4. Higher Net Present Value of Forest Land-Use

Net present value (NPV) is the present value of future cash flows. Rights to money generated from forest-based enterprises can make the NPV of a forest more valuable than other competing uses (e.g., cattle ranching, farming, plantations, etc).  If a forest has a higher NPV relative to other land uses, then income decreases if the forest is deforested. With a higher NPV, forest right holders are incentivized to maintain the land as a forest resource, rather than to convert the forest to other land uses (deforestation).

Thinking in terms of forest NPV is critical to understanding the decision-making process regarding forest conservation and deforestation. In the next article, we will explore how current forest conservation trends align with this principle of forest economics.

Like this post? Have a problem with it? Have other ideas? Please leave a comment below!

Crowd Forest supports the global network of people, businesses, and communities who add value to tropical forests and constitute the enterprise approach to tropical forest conservation (#ForestEnterprise). Join us on Twitter, LinkedIn and Facebook.

 

One thought on “When Logging is Better at Preventing Tree-Canopy Loss than Protected Areas

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s